docs: add 'How A.I.G Compares' section to README - #635
Open
boy-hack wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Adds a scope-comparison table against garak, PyRIT, Promptfoo, and mcp-scan to help visitors landing from search quickly understand A.I.G's differentiation (multi-surface: infra CVE + MCP + Skill + Agent + jailbreak) versus single-purpose red-teaming tools. Intended to improve discoverability for readers comparing AI red-teaming tools; framed as scope difference, not a superiority claim, and invites corrections if any row goes stale.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Adds a new
🆚 How A.I.G Comparessection to README.md with a scope-comparison table against NVIDIA garak, Microsoft PyRIT, Promptfoo, and Invariant mcp-scan.Why
Part of an ongoing discoverability push (GitHub Topics/description are already comprehensive, Star History chart and Trendshift badge are already present). The one gap identified: a visitor landing from a Google search comparing AI red-teaming tools has no quick way to see how A.I.G's scope differs from single-purpose tools like garak/PyRIT/Promptfoo/mcp-scan. This table addresses that.
Framing
Deliberately framed as a scope difference, not a superiority claim — the table explicitly says the other tools are excellent at what they specialize in and are worth running alongside A.I.G. Every checkmark/row is based on what's in each tool's own README/docs as of today; happy to correct any row a maintainer of those projects flags as inaccurate.
Risk
Docs-only change, no code/build impact. Opening as a PR (not pushing to main) for maintainer review per project convention, and because README changes are user-facing content worth a second pair of eyes.